Every effective council begins with clarity of purpose. An AI Council charter is essential. It sets out why the council exists, how it will operate, and the principles that guide its decisions. The charter doesn’t need to be lengthy, but it must be unambiguous. It should articulate the organisation’s position on ethical AI, transparency, accountability, data governance, and the use of emerging technologies. It becomes the anchor point whenever questions arise, particularly as new AI capabilities appear and policy landscapes shift.
Selecting the right mix of people matters just as much as defining purpose. A strong council is intentionally diverse. It shouldn’t be a group of technologists debating model architectures, but a cross-functional body that reflects how AI will touch every part of the organisation. Senior executives play a critical role, providing strategic oversight and ensuring decisions carry weight. An AI Product Manager sits at the heart of this mix, alongside leaders from IT, legal, marketing, operations, analytics, and the PMO bring context from their respective domains, highlighting risks, opportunities and impacts that may not be immediately obvious.
Technical experts, such as data scientists, AI specialists and security professionals, all provide insight into feasibility and risk. Ethical or risk advisors, whether internal or external, ensure decisions remain grounded in fairness, privacy requirements and regulatory expectations. And importantly, business unit leaders help translate abstract potential into real commercial or service outcomes. A designated chairperson keeps the group focused, ensures follow-through, and maintains momentum. Without this role, councils often drift into occasional discussion rather than structured governance.